Is this a good argument for a gods existence?

If, if, if, if.... any argument that relies on "if" fails automatically. Nothing can stand on "if". It just baseless umption, not evidence, not fact. The opening argument supposes that maaaaybe this thing exists (maybe, even though there is no evidence that it does), and then throws down a bunch of "ifs" - that don't do anything to strengthen the argument, because "ifs" are useless if the first of the argument can't stand up on its own. The whole thing just falls apart. The closing statement is just useless.